here's my listing of 10 suppressed natural cancer remedies. Indeed, this is not
an exhaustive account and you'll know others. Either way I encourage you to
definitely do your own research but watch out for the deliberate misinformation
media sources using their weak arguments and purposely omitted relevant
information to make the situation against cheap, natural and non-toxic option
cures look stronger or possible. Some of them are privately cancer establishment
sponsored!
1. Regal (William) Rife's Cancer Machine
In the 1930's California microbiologist Royal Rife after several years put together a 'universal microscope' basically designed to pay attention to cancer cells by identifying their own wave frequency of vibration being dissimilar to normal cells... The universal microscope could then supply to send beams of a particular frequency from a ray pipe which zapped and killed the actual cancer cells. This Rife called the mortal oscillatory rate that was very successful in destroying most cancers in patients. So successful, actually, Rife's machine cured 16 from 16 cancer patients and some have been hopeless cases.
However, into the 1940's and 50's well to the manufacture of the cancer devices, having established treatment clinics, Rife found himself caught up inside a legal wrangle with the establishment's big boys like the American Medical Association. In revenge of Rife winning court instances... his equipment was finally set to rest, seized by the actual authorities for illegal alternative methods in medicine.
2. Laetrile Most cancers Treatment
Ernest Krebs learned how the isolated indigenous Hunsas people living in the foot of the Himalayas lived to high ages before death. He found that apricot kernels was greatly used in their diet, that contains high vitamin B17 levels, which he theorised was accountable for contributing to no cancer recorded in this region. He made a refined (distilled) edition of vitamin B17 and known as it laetrile. It was found that laetrile or even B17 destroyed the enzyme beta-glycosidase within the cancer cell's metabolic pathway and therefore could cure cancer when utilizing it as a therapy.
Bad technology (deliberate? ), politics, corporate greed and adverse promotion basically destroyed this great breakthrough from getting deserved recognition in particular...
3. Harry Hoxey's Herbal Treatments
Successful businessman Harry Hoxey following curing his horse with cancer used exactly the same paste-applied herbal remedy on individuals. His herbal formula had accomplished 80% success over 80 many years. In the 1960's his clinic in Texas was turn off for illegal practices... All with regard to curing people of cancer. A former nurse dealing with Hoxey's remedy took the remedy to Mexico which still survives these days.
4. Metabolic Nutritional Therapy
This is actually the idea that certain anti-cancer foods may be used as a strict dietary routine. Again this has been highly successful however the cancer establishment seldom mention nourishment: No money to be created there...
5. Gerson Therapy
This follows on from 4 in the respects that it's a form of metabolic dietary therapy, using body detoxification to assist along the way. Gerson therapy originally devised through Max Gerson was fully accepted in congress from hearings within the 1920's but was later struck from the record. One can only assume due to the threat it posed to undercutting the actual medical/pharmaceutical's businesses and less governmental income... if got to the public in particular.
6. Otto Warburg Oxygen Treatment
Another great individual with his pioneering work within the 1930's was biochemist Otto Warburg. He was unjustly ridiculed by the establishment for picking out the finding that oxygen is definitely an environment that cancer cells can't stand. Warburg said that cancer cells manifest within an oxygen deprived environment. Why do you consider you never hear of cancer from the heart? It's because the center contains oxygen rich blood... It's been ignored by the business.
7. John Baird Proteolytic Enzyme Treatment
At the turn of the actual 20th century Scottish doctor Baird realized that during early foetal development the actual mother's placental cells behave like cancer cells for the reason that they show rapid growth. Through pregnancy day 56, when the actual foetus has formed its pancreas, it produces pancreatic enzymes that turn off this rapid growth. So essentially Baird theorised, given that these placental tissue behave like cancer cells for the reason that they exhibit rapid growth, such as the foetal cells, could the cancer cells be turned off by pancreatic enzymes? The solution is yes! Yes, cancer might be successfully treated using pancreatic nutrients. However, in spite of it's success, the treatment was laid in order to rest invalidated and radiation therapy was chosen through the establishment instead...
8. Tullio Simoncini Most cancers Therapy
Brilliant tenacious Italian doctor Tullio Simoncini may be subjected to huge pressures in the establishment to succumb: In spite from the ridicule and attempts at lawful action he continues his function today focussing on treating cancer like a fungus called Candida resulting from the poor immune system. Simoncini found that antifungal treatment didn't work. The solution was not just cheap but simple. He gave patients sodium bicarbonate internally with an endoscope (tube). This allows the bicarbonate to visit directly to the cancer. Mentionened above previously above this great cancer discovery has however been largely ignored through the cancer establishment.
9. Stanislaw Burzynski Antineoplastons
There's a movie available to see on U-Tube called "Cancer Is really a Serious Business. " This honor winning scandalous true story film made my cry. It shows what sort of medical man &biochemist Dr Stanislaw Burzynski found a cancer cure using gene treatment, but had to deal using the mite of the American Meals and Drug Administration who attempted to criminalise him for their practices. A 14 year sixty million dollar US tax payer's cash legal battle ensued... The proven fact that he had help saved numerous lives, curing sometimes even hopeless cancer cases was never the problem! The real issue was the truth that Dr Burzynski was undercutting the actual cancer establishment's business...
10. Anti-Oxidants
The late great scientist two times Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling was rejected when he tried to get funding together with his colleagues for further research on vitamin C and it is role in fighting cancer: He found that leukaemia sufferers had low amounts of vitamin C. When these sufferers received frequently high doses of supplement C they went into remission (recovery)... Pauling also learned that frequent vitamin C high dosing halts the migratory pathways that most cancers cells use to metastasise (spread). It is inconceivable to me that this may be ignored but has been (and nevertheless is).
In summary
The above clearly implies that the medical/pharmaceutical establishment has top of the hand in controlling cancer. Energy, political gain and profit tend to be indeed the ulterior motives. I'd encourage the reader to perform his/her own study and learn how to discern: For example, look in the mass media reports on cancer and get yourself does this have vested curiosity. Ask yourself who stands to achieve..?
1. Regal (William) Rife's Cancer Machine
In the 1930's California microbiologist Royal Rife after several years put together a 'universal microscope' basically designed to pay attention to cancer cells by identifying their own wave frequency of vibration being dissimilar to normal cells... The universal microscope could then supply to send beams of a particular frequency from a ray pipe which zapped and killed the actual cancer cells. This Rife called the mortal oscillatory rate that was very successful in destroying most cancers in patients. So successful, actually, Rife's machine cured 16 from 16 cancer patients and some have been hopeless cases.
However, into the 1940's and 50's well to the manufacture of the cancer devices, having established treatment clinics, Rife found himself caught up inside a legal wrangle with the establishment's big boys like the American Medical Association. In revenge of Rife winning court instances... his equipment was finally set to rest, seized by the actual authorities for illegal alternative methods in medicine.
2. Laetrile Most cancers Treatment
Ernest Krebs learned how the isolated indigenous Hunsas people living in the foot of the Himalayas lived to high ages before death. He found that apricot kernels was greatly used in their diet, that contains high vitamin B17 levels, which he theorised was accountable for contributing to no cancer recorded in this region. He made a refined (distilled) edition of vitamin B17 and known as it laetrile. It was found that laetrile or even B17 destroyed the enzyme beta-glycosidase within the cancer cell's metabolic pathway and therefore could cure cancer when utilizing it as a therapy.
Bad technology (deliberate? ), politics, corporate greed and adverse promotion basically destroyed this great breakthrough from getting deserved recognition in particular...
3. Harry Hoxey's Herbal Treatments
Successful businessman Harry Hoxey following curing his horse with cancer used exactly the same paste-applied herbal remedy on individuals. His herbal formula had accomplished 80% success over 80 many years. In the 1960's his clinic in Texas was turn off for illegal practices... All with regard to curing people of cancer. A former nurse dealing with Hoxey's remedy took the remedy to Mexico which still survives these days.
4. Metabolic Nutritional Therapy
This is actually the idea that certain anti-cancer foods may be used as a strict dietary routine. Again this has been highly successful however the cancer establishment seldom mention nourishment: No money to be created there...
5. Gerson Therapy
This follows on from 4 in the respects that it's a form of metabolic dietary therapy, using body detoxification to assist along the way. Gerson therapy originally devised through Max Gerson was fully accepted in congress from hearings within the 1920's but was later struck from the record. One can only assume due to the threat it posed to undercutting the actual medical/pharmaceutical's businesses and less governmental income... if got to the public in particular.
6. Otto Warburg Oxygen Treatment
Another great individual with his pioneering work within the 1930's was biochemist Otto Warburg. He was unjustly ridiculed by the establishment for picking out the finding that oxygen is definitely an environment that cancer cells can't stand. Warburg said that cancer cells manifest within an oxygen deprived environment. Why do you consider you never hear of cancer from the heart? It's because the center contains oxygen rich blood... It's been ignored by the business.
7. John Baird Proteolytic Enzyme Treatment
At the turn of the actual 20th century Scottish doctor Baird realized that during early foetal development the actual mother's placental cells behave like cancer cells for the reason that they show rapid growth. Through pregnancy day 56, when the actual foetus has formed its pancreas, it produces pancreatic enzymes that turn off this rapid growth. So essentially Baird theorised, given that these placental tissue behave like cancer cells for the reason that they exhibit rapid growth, such as the foetal cells, could the cancer cells be turned off by pancreatic enzymes? The solution is yes! Yes, cancer might be successfully treated using pancreatic nutrients. However, in spite of it's success, the treatment was laid in order to rest invalidated and radiation therapy was chosen through the establishment instead...
8. Tullio Simoncini Most cancers Therapy
Brilliant tenacious Italian doctor Tullio Simoncini may be subjected to huge pressures in the establishment to succumb: In spite from the ridicule and attempts at lawful action he continues his function today focussing on treating cancer like a fungus called Candida resulting from the poor immune system. Simoncini found that antifungal treatment didn't work. The solution was not just cheap but simple. He gave patients sodium bicarbonate internally with an endoscope (tube). This allows the bicarbonate to visit directly to the cancer. Mentionened above previously above this great cancer discovery has however been largely ignored through the cancer establishment.
9. Stanislaw Burzynski Antineoplastons
There's a movie available to see on U-Tube called "Cancer Is really a Serious Business. " This honor winning scandalous true story film made my cry. It shows what sort of medical man &biochemist Dr Stanislaw Burzynski found a cancer cure using gene treatment, but had to deal using the mite of the American Meals and Drug Administration who attempted to criminalise him for their practices. A 14 year sixty million dollar US tax payer's cash legal battle ensued... The proven fact that he had help saved numerous lives, curing sometimes even hopeless cancer cases was never the problem! The real issue was the truth that Dr Burzynski was undercutting the actual cancer establishment's business...
10. Anti-Oxidants
The late great scientist two times Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling was rejected when he tried to get funding together with his colleagues for further research on vitamin C and it is role in fighting cancer: He found that leukaemia sufferers had low amounts of vitamin C. When these sufferers received frequently high doses of supplement C they went into remission (recovery)... Pauling also learned that frequent vitamin C high dosing halts the migratory pathways that most cancers cells use to metastasise (spread). It is inconceivable to me that this may be ignored but has been (and nevertheless is).
In summary
The above clearly implies that the medical/pharmaceutical establishment has top of the hand in controlling cancer. Energy, political gain and profit tend to be indeed the ulterior motives. I'd encourage the reader to perform his/her own study and learn how to discern: For example, look in the mass media reports on cancer and get yourself does this have vested curiosity. Ask yourself who stands to achieve..?
0 comments:
Post a Comment